Return-to-office (RTO) policies are stirring debate once again.
Just when hybrid and remote work seemed to be the norm, large companies like Amazon, JPMorgan Chase, and Nike, are now demanding that team members start returning to the office, sometimes as much as five full days a week.
What’s more, 83 percent of CEOs are anticipating a full return to on-site work within three years.
Some leaders claim that working from home hinders innovation, lowers engagement, and dilutes culture, while many experts continue to expound on the benefits of hybrid and remote work.
Let’s take a closer look at each side of the return-to-office vs. remote work debate to see whether remote and hybrid work are really worth embracing or leaving behind.
A look at pro-RTO stances
Proponents of a full return-to-office policy argue that in-person work enhances consistency and transparency.
They also say it promotes equality since roles that are inherently on-site, such as in the maintenance or hospitality industries, prevent everyone from having equal access to hybrid flexibility in an organization—which can cause tension between on-site and hybrid workers.
Beyond concerns around equality, many leaders advocating for RTO believe it improves accountability, focus, and genuine productivity. The concept of “fauxductivity”—or appearing busy without producing meaningful outcomes—is a major worry for these leaders, who are concerned that remote work reduces oversight.
Their concerns aren’t unfounded.
Research shows that almost half of remote professionals carry out other tasks like household chores during work calls, and a third take advantage of remote work to run errands such as picking up groceries.
Despite these concerns, recent remote work productivity data paints a more well-rounded picture.
Studies from Gallup reveal that 52 percent of people in hybrid roles report greater productivity and 64 percent believe hybrid work is a more efficient use of their time.
What’s more, most hybrid professionals experience reduced stress and burnout, with 85 percent stating that flexible arrangements have improved their job satisfaction.
Ultimately, a full return to the office is only valuable if it genuinely improves results. If people are meeting or even surpassing goals, is there really a need to monitor their location or routine?
At the end of the day, organizational leaders want results for their business from genuine productivity and engagement at work—and reducing burnout through hybrid work can help.
Is RTO worth the resource drain?
A return-to-office policy does come with its costs.
For many teams, the call to return to the office full-time has triggered resistance.
This is because return-to-office mandates often clash with a fundamental need for autonomy and trust in the workplace.
Ian Greenleigh, VP of brand and communications at IT platform 1E, notes that organizations failing to consider the broader impact of strict RTO policies risk losing valuable connections with their people.
“When they don’t look at the negative externalities, and they don’t look at the full picture of data,” Greenleigh explains, “they’re going to miss a lot of employee concerns and valid anxiety about the state of things like trust between employee and employer.”
RTO mandates come with further consequences, too: Approximately four in 10 remote professionals would consider leaving their jobs if their employer were to force them to return to the office.
Given the fact that losing a professional costs an organization anywhere between 10 and 213 percent of their salary and that office spaces come with a price tag of $7,700 per person a year, an RTO mandate can prove quite costly.
Considering the stakes, companies may have to rethink whether enforcing strict in-office policies is worth the risk to both morale and the bottom line.
The high-level business repercussions of RTOs
Mandated return-to-office policies can lead to significant impacts on finances and workforce composition.
A study by the University of Chicago found that enforcing RTO led to a notable exodus of senior team members, particularly those with expertise critical to organizational success.
Many of these skilled professionals moved to competitors who offered greater flexibility.
This outflow of seasoned staff leaves companies with a talent gap, forcing them to rely on junior-level professionals who lack the right experience, which impacts productivity.
RTO mandates also contribute to shorter tenures and long-standing team members leaving at higher rates. This shift means companies lose invaluable institutional knowledge. At the same time, they must increasingly invest in hiring and onboarding—an expensive process when replacing experienced team members.
As organizations face ongoing skill shortages, these high-level repercussions make a strong case for flexibility-focused policies that prioritize long-term retention over location mandates.
The profitability of hybrid and remote work structures
Hybrid and remote work models not only increase satisfaction among your people but can also garner greater profits for your business.
Companies with flexible work structures see lower turnover and reduced operating costs.
Well-structured hybrid or remote policies also promote genuine productivity. By freeing up time for team members’ personal tasks and providing better work-life balance, flexible work reduces stress, helps people recharge, and empowers them to deliver better results.
Contrary to some perceptions, people in hybrid roles are much more engaged than their fully on-site peers, proving that flexibility can enhance work outcomes rather than diminish them.
What’s more, companies adopting hybrid work tend to save nearly 50 percent on office space costs.
Reallocate real estate budgets to boost innovation and satisfaction
Saving so much on office space means companies adopting hybrid models can redirect funds to people-centered programs that boost satisfaction and innovation, such as:
- Learning and development programs to plug skills gaps and satisfy team members’ ambitions to grow
- Wellness initiatives to promote greater satisfaction and reduce stress-related sick leave
- Team-building activities to nurture connections between team members and promote a collaborative working environment for greater innovation
Reallocating real estate budgets to people-focused initiatives provides organizations with significant returns, positively impacting business in the long run.
Recommended For Further Reading
Flexibility as a key driver of modern business success
Forcing team members back into the office on a strict five-day schedule can perpetuate “presenteeism“—a phenomenon where people are present in the office but unproductive.
Rigid attendance policies can also lead to disengagement, as today’s workforce values autonomy and control over how and where they complete their work.
Micromanagement, common in organizations with strict return-to-office mandates, can stifle innovation and repel top talent.
“If you micromanage, you won’t get productivity gains, and you won’t attract the next generation,” says Sir Cary Cooper, professor of organizational psychology and health at the University of Manchester’s Alliance Manchester Business School.
In contrast, flexible work structures contribute to a culture that values results over presence, leading to stronger team morale, retention, and long-term performance.
By shifting focus from where people work to what they achieve, forward-thinking organizations can position themselves as leaders, attracting and retaining diverse talent ready to meet evolving business demands.
More than a trend
The extensive hybrid work benefits for SMBs and larger organizations—along with the fact that flexibility is an expectation among top talent—mean flexible working models are indispensable for long-term success.
As we’ve seen, hybrid and remote work leads to higher productivity, improved wellbeing, and stronger retention.
But the advantages of hybrid and remote work go beyond immediate productivity gains. These models empower people and build loyalty by showing them that their employers trust them to work where they’re most effective.
For businesses looking to thrive, embracing flexible work is more than a trend—it’s a vital strategy for future-proofing their organizations.
